Powrót
Source - http://sanityisdead.blogspot.com/2009_06_01_archive.html


"The unaware are unaware that they are unaware." ~Merril M.E. Jenkins Sr



The world view promoted through education, media and generally in every day of life is one that denies the reality of conspiracies. The vast majority of people in the world do not believe in conspiracies. A dictionary will define a conspiracy as the act of two or more people coming together to plot to do something that is illegal. The truth is the world is full of conspiracy.

If there was no such thing as conspiracies governments would not need Intelligence Agencies, which they themselves, sit behind closed doors and secretly plot on how to infiltrate another government illegally to gather intelligence they have no legal right to obtain. Those people who reject conspiracies as real just have not thought the issue through, or they simply don't want to believe that there are people in the world who plot the enslavement or destruction of others. If this is your belief I ask you where did Communism come from?

In fact conspiracies are part of every day life. People conspire with work associates to get a better position over someone else. Politicians conspire all the time to win public favour and also for their own personal gain. Many events which happened let's say 20 years ago are being exposed such as the government sponsored human radiation experiments in the USA. The CIA MK Ultra mind control program which was exposed in the late 1970's is another example of a cabal of people conspiring in secret to implement an agenda which the public would not approve. Plots and actions are exposed all the time. Conspiracies are a fact of life.

Conspiracies exist all over the place. The question is not if conspiracies exist, for if they did not, we would not have that word in the dictionary. The question becomes, is there such a thing as a conspiracy to control the entire world and enslave the people in a feudalistic and socialistic order? Also if there is in fact such a thing is it provable? Well, the answer to both questions is a resounding YES!

Views of History

There are two basic views of history. One we can term the 'Accidental View of History'. This view is the view which the majority of people believe in. This view pertains to the notion that events in history basically occur by accident and are merely the results of the conditions existing at the time. Events just occur and there is no real meaning to them. This is the view of the world we are presented with everyday by the news media, educational institutions and claimed experts. The 'Accidental View of History' is simply the accepted world view.

The other view of history can be termed as the 'Conspiracy View of History'. This is the cause and effect view of history. This view holds that major events in history are the result of careful planning and that these events are carried out with a desired goal in mind. Also events which arise which are not preplanned are manipulated to bring about a desireable result. This view of history is ridiculed and its exponents are portrayed as paranoid and delusional individuals.

Those who view the events of the past as an accident are people who have never questioned the events deeply that go on around them while those who accept the conspiracy view of history as fact are those who have taken the time to carefully study it. For I absolutely guarantee you that if you take the time to carefully examine the evidence for the conspiratorial view of history with an open mind you will be quite amazed and most probably quite shocked with regrads to the amount of evidence which exists and also to the implications which surround the topic.

Now, how is it possible to bring in a totalitarian socialist world government without the people realising? To understand this you NEED to be informed in two critical areas which play an important role. These areas are:

1.) Mind Control

2.) The Monetary System

An understanding of both of these is very important and I will briefly discuss both below. I encourage you to do your own research into these areas as what I have put together here is only a very brief summary.


Mind Control Techniques

Mind control techniques are being used throughout society to an amazing degree and these techniques are very successful. So very few people are aware of this. I guarantee that if this is a new concept to you then you are being controlled. Please don't be offended by this statement as I too was once brainwashed and completely ignorant of this subject matter and thus lived in a fantasy land. Yet I awakened, and so can you! Mind control is merely the influence and control of the way and of what you THINK.

The main method mind control is achieved is by the control of the information you receive. By limiting the information you recieve this in turn limits the thoughts that you will usually think about. Your choices are limited in other words. The novel 1984 explained this quite well in the appendix entitled 'The Principles of Newspeak.' Many people read books like this and yet do not realise that such literature was written as a warning to people.

People are also kept occupied with side issues of no real importance like Abortion or Gay rights. The reason I say no real importance is because Gay rights and Abortion is not the underlying problem with America. People will speak out about particular issues and injustices but because they do not see the whole scenario all their efforts are in vain. Many of these people are doing an honorable thing yet they do not understand the true principles which are driving the globalist agenda. If there is not a "Globalist Agenda", then what is all the talk about Globalization and the Global Economy?

Conflicting words and confused meanings of words is another technique used in mind control. A good example of the manipulation of words and their meanings is the use of the word 'democracy' to describe the American form of government. The President of the United States and the media always refer to the U.S.A. as a democracy. The United States Constitution states emphatically that the U.S.A. is a Constitutional Republic and this is very different than a democracy. The use of the word democracy by the media has led to a high percentage of the population to falsely believe that the United States is a democracy.

Also many people believe that a democracy and a constitutional republic are the same thing. I would encourage you to look this up, and remember don't believe anything I am telling you unless you check it out for yourself. People are decieved right now because they follow without ever questioning what they are told. Did you know the following was quoted by V.I. Lenin, "democracy is indispensible to socialism." Whoever can best work the mob can achieve their own ends. Crisis creation (see below) also plays a primary role in this area.

Politicians always talk about debt and taxes. They know that people will vote for the candidate that will make things cost less for them. Those in power know how we think. People are too worried about money and they forget about 'little' issues like freedom. The television has been the most successful medium ever used in the history of the world to manipulate people. The news bulletins put a spin on the stories presented which suits those who are in control.

Television series and movies are used to condition people to view the world in a way depicted in the film or to prepare the population for upcoming events so that they will react in a desirable way. It is apparent that when outside information contradicts the television world view the outside information is usually rejected in favor of the 'accepted' world view by most people. The control of mass media has led to a highly suggestable population.

How is the media controlled? Most of the media is owned by a few corporations and the slant presented must fall in line with the corporation policy. Also many of these corporations are in debt to International Financiers and thus are kept in check by these interests so as to keep the money flowing. The borrower is always a slave to the lender, remember that. Also just about all of the high profile names in the media are members of the various known globalist think tanks such as the Council on Foreign Relations.

Next time you are watching the 6pm news, change stations and you will notice that every station has the same headlines and furthermore they also all present the same slant or viewpoint on each particular story. Many events occur in the world every day, why is it that the same few stories are covered on each network? If there was real competition in the media and a free press the slant and stories would not be the same. Also if the television news bulletins were not intentional propaganda the issues I discuss on this blog would be mentioned ad naseum.

Few people realize that the flickering of the television screen induces a mild hypnotic state where the process of critical thinking is impaired. This is the reason many television commercials have flashing lights and lots of quick movement. In this hypnotic state the mind is more suggestable and liable to mental programming. Many scientific studies have proven this as fact, yet by simply observing someone who is engrossed in a television show you will clearly see this altered state of mind. Better yet, observe a 5 year old watching cartoons, they look like a Zombie. Which is why my 6 year old son watches Discovery & Animal Planet.

Short news bulletins and commercials have conditioned people to learn in sound bites. People have been programmed to have short attention spans and thus they tend not to delve into topics which take time and effort to digest.

With regards to the television you watch, my advice is for you to turn it off. The television corrupts and manipulates your thinking and judgement. The television is also desensitising the world to what is coming. Now you may well be thinking all I have said so far is nonsense but I would just ask you to consider these things. Go and do some research on these issues and educate yourself, and stop blindly believing what you are told. Hopefully you will begin to reconsider things in a new light.

The scientific establishment even uses mind control techniques and I am sure you find this hard to believe. Take note next time you read a scientific journal that practically everything is written in 'positive language.' Positive language is where a discovery is stated as a 'matter of fact' when the discovery may be based on certain unprovable assumptions which were taken on to work a theory.

To understand this you must understand that many scientific discoveries are speculation based on a theory, and this theory is also speculation. A theory is proposed to explain a particular observable effect or effects. Now there may be many different speculative theories which would lead to the same observable effects. By the use of positive language the reader is left with the impression that other theories do not exist and also with the impression that the theory described is an indisputable fact. This violates the scientific process and a comparison with the science of a hundred years ago and the way discoveries were worded is very revealing indeed. The present method is employed to limit your choice of ideas to that of what is currently accepted by the establishment. This is mind control.

Mind control in reality is not the mind control depicted in many films. It is totally different than many people realise. I cannot put enough emphasis on the study of mind control and propaganda techniques. When you understand how mind control and propaganda work you will be able to resist the effects. If you do not take the time to learn these things you will continue to be led like a sheep .

"Today Americans would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told there was an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all the peoples of the world will plead with world leaders to deliver them from this evil. The one thing that every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well being granted to them by their world government." ~Henry Kissinger, in an address to the Bilderbergers group, May 21, 1992- Evian, France.


Education


The educational system is heavily responsible for the shaping of people's world view. We all go through school and are presented with certain 'facts' and are also presented with an accepted world view. If we dispute or question these 'facts' we will suffer in our grades, thus without us realising we are being manipulated into a 'correct' thinking pattern.

The fact today is that schools, universities and other educational institutions are vast indoctrination centers which are churning out people who are unquestioning as to the reality they have been presented and are also highly suggestable as in regards to their acceptance of the mainstream outlets of information. This is a sad scenario indeed. Now you may not like to hear these things but the evidence leads to this conclusion.

Also one point I have noticed which I find interesting is that the more formal education an individual aquires the less open minded and questioning they become. Personally I believe this is so because people wish to feel secure with regards to their present position in society. When these people are presented with an alternative world view they immediately dismiss it as false without even examining the evidence and thinking about it. An alternative view of the world is a threat to these people as it immediately puts their life and position in question and people just want to feel comfortable.

Also these people have invested significant amounts of money, time and effort to gain their qualification and the last thing they want to be confronted with is a reality which will interfere with their plans. This also applies to those with a high standing in life. To be open minded and willing to challenge what one believes can entail massive implications especially in regards to this particular subject of the New World Order. It changed basically every aspect of my life, these issues caused me to step back and reconsider my life and completely alter my direction.

An important aspect which the current educational institutions do not teach is that of the process defined as 'critical thinking.' Critical thinking is a process of thinking that someone will undertake when presented with information, no matter what the source, they take in the information and then think about it in a critical way before accepting it as fact. Critical thinking is basically just questioning information instead of blindly accepting information. Today the majority of people blindy accept most of what they are told by so called 'experts' and they never even question what they are told, this can be termed as the 'authority syndrome.'

Educational institutions are funded heavily by many foundations such as the Rockerfeller Foundation and the Carnegie Foundation. The foundations have heavy influence on the subject matter taught, the bias put forth, and many other areas through grants to textbook departments and other areas. Government funding also serves the same purpose. This is why one of the planks of the Communist Manifesto was a state controlled public education system.


The Monetary System


This in my book is an absolute J-O-K-E. The Federal Reserve is a PRIVATE entity (Bank or Corporation) that the American Government "BORROWS" money from to pay for everything. AT INTEREST.

The U.S. dollar is backed by absolutely nothing, it is useless paper. There is nothing that makes the $100 bill worth more than a $1 bill. It is the same size, made of the same ink and paper and costs the same amout of money to print: $.02 CENTS. That is the cost of printing a $100 bill.

The Federal Reserve takes that $100 bill and loans it to other banks for the lowly interest rate of .025%.

Just so I am clear: The Fed makes a $100 for $.02 cents and LOANS it at face value ($100) plus the 1/4% interest! That is a profit margin of 500,000%

Keep in mind, the Fed controls all of the money in circulation. So, whenever the Fed came into existence, they created (Loaned) the money to be put into circulation with interest attached. this interest CANNOT ever be paid off.

For example: Lets just say the Fed loaned the Govt $5 Billion @ 5% interest to be issued to the people tomorrow. There is NO other money in circulation. There are only 5 people on earth, making it $1 Billion for each person. But, this money has interest attached, being it was loaned out. So, if each person turned right back around and gave the $1 Billion back to the Federal Reserve, the Fed would have all of the money back that it loaned into circulation. But, there is still the issue of the INTEREST that those 5 people still owe on the loan. Where is the $250,000,000 in INTEREST going to come from? There is no more money left, you gave all $5 Billion back to the bank.

Answer: It does not exist.


So what does the Govt do on our behalf to pay back the interest? Borrow MORE money from the Federal Reserve, therefore going DEEPER into debt. Now you can understand why the United States national debt is $12,000,000,000 (Trillion) Dollars.

The more money that is in circulation, the more worthless it becomes. More money in circulation means that the prices for all goods and services must rise accordingly, otherwise everyone would be getting a "good deal". That is why a horse cost $30 in 1913 and today it costs $1,000.

Inflation is just a hidden tax, nothing more.

Since 1913, the U.S. Dollar has declined in value by 97%.


Here is a quote by Mayer Amschel Rothschild: "Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes the laws."

More that half the shareholdings in the Federal Reserve Bank arc controlled by large New York City banks, including National City Bank, National Bank of Commerce, First National Bank, Chase National Bank, and Marine National Bank. When Rockefeller's National City Bank merged with J.P. Morgan's First National Bank in 1955, the Rockefeller group owned 22 percent of the shares of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, which in turn holds the majority of shares in the Federal Reserve System - 53 percent. But who really owns what?

Here are the top controllers of the Federal Reserve Bank

1. Rothchild banks of London and Berlin.
2. Lazard Brothers Banks of Paris.
3. Israel Moses Seif Banks of Italy.
4. Warburg Bank of Hamburg and Amsterdam.
5. Lehman Brothers Bank of New York.
6. Kuhn, Loeb bank of New York.
7. Chase Manhattan Bank of New York, which controls all of the other 11 Federal Reserve Banks. (Rockefeller owned)
8. Goldman, Sachs Bank of New York.

This ownership combination has been challenged by the Federal Reserve Bank, but a study of Standards and Poors will verify the ownerships. This means that the controlling interest of our national monetary system is foreign. In 1797, John Adams wrote to Thomas Jefferson, "All the perplexities, confusion and distress in America arise, not from defects of the Constitution or Confederation; not from any want of honor or virtue, as much as downright ignorance of the nature of coin, credit and circulation."

Going back to Rothschild for a min, the story of how he got control over the economy of England is one of the best stories EVER.

http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4GGLL_enUS302US302&q=rothschild+waterloo


Now we understand that the PRIVATE bankers of the Federal Reserve make money by loaning the Govt money. Greed is key here, so what could possibly make a Govt borrow more money so the PRIVATE Bankers could make more money from the interest?

1.) Economy crashing, you will need "stimulus" (more money pumped into the system).

2.) Wars. Govts need a LOT ($3 Trillion) of money for wars. Who wins in this situation? BANKERS. Is it possible that International Bankers could cause an incident or series of incidents that would make 2 countries go to war? Well, its in their best 'interests'.

3.) It is a PROVEN FACT that the SAME bankers financed both sides of WWII. That fact alone should prove what I am saying.

4.) Abe Lincoln was killed because he issued his own money (The Greenback) for the Civil War. He told the International Bankers to go......Climb a tree. Then he was killed.

The Panic of 1907 led to the Federal Reserve Act in 1913. Then we went into WWI in 1917. Good times in the Roaring 1920's! Then POW!!! The stock market crash of 1929. Followed by the Great Depression (Banker caused, this is a historical FACT).

The Depression was "ended" by WWII. ANOTHER war....Then good times in the late 1940's and early 50's until the Korean War. (More borrowing)

Then in 1962, JFK issued Silver Certificates for the U.S. Dollar. Then in 1963 he said he was going to get rid of the Federal Reserve and break the CIA into 1000 pieces.

Can I get a witness as to what year JFK was killed!? 1963

Then LBJ is President. America needs another war......So, in 1964 we get the Gulf of Tonkin Incident.

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&rlz=1T4GGLL_enUS302US302&q=gulf+of+tonkin+incident

Which led to the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution.

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&rlz=1T4GGLL_enUS302US302&q=gulf+of+tonkin+resolution

Which states that....Well, I will cut and paste the info below.

The Gulf of Tonkin Resolution (officially, the Southeast Asia Resolution, Public Law 88-408) was addressed by President Lyndon B. Johnson as a joint resolution of the United States Congress passed on August 10, 1964 in direct response to a reported minor naval engagement known as the Gulf of Tonkin Incident. It is of historical significance because it gave U.S. President Lyndon B. Johnson authorization, without a formal declaration of war by Congress, for the use of military force in Southeast Asia. The Johnson administration subsequently cited the resolution as legal ay for its rapid escalation of U.S. military involvement in the Vietnam conflict.


Substitute Johnson with "Bush" and Vietnam with "Iraq" and you have the EXACT same thing. Congress gave Bush the authorization for the use of force in Iraq.

Vietnam lasted 12 years and ended in a stalemate. I have studied it pretty close and the rules of engagement are INSANE. The Vietnam war was never meant to be won, it was meant to be sustained. The U.S. has the biggest and best military machine in HISTORY, yet we can't beat a 5th rate Kleptocracy in Vietnam? SUSTAINED, for more borrowing of course.

Who got the contract to rebuild Vietnam? Brown & Root, Lady Bird Johnson family's business....

So, Vietnam is over in the early 70's. Decent times followed but in the 80's things were pretty good. We had the Cold War with the USSR, so military spending and Govt borrowing were still going great! No need for a large scale war.

So we get Saddam Hussein in the 80's to fight Iran (Saddam borrowed heavily from International Bankers). After that war, Saddam was BROKE and needed to pay his loans back. So he starts selling his oil cheaper than OPEC and flooding the world with cheap oil because he has to pay his debts to the Intl Bankers. Personally, I think they were hoping he would default and Bankers and Corporations would own large parts of Iraq (OIL).

So Saddam is flooding the world with cheap oil and OPEC did not like this. Old man Bush and his cronies (Saudi Royal Family) had to stop it because they could not make huge profits from their own oil sales, Saddam was undercutting them.

So, what do they do? They send the Ambassador to Saddam and tell him he can invade Kuwait and nobody will really do anything. So he invades Kuwait....Right into the trap.

This is just the excuse the U.S. needs to take Saddam's military out and destroy his oilfields so he can't sell oil for a while. This would also make the price of oil jump drastically and make nice profits for the Saudis.

Which is why Saddam lit the oil wells in Kuwait on fire, he figured out the U.S. had tricked him into doing it. He was a little pissed probably. Plus Halliburton made a lot of $$ putting out those oil well fires.

Then the USSR collapses in 1991. Whoops, no more "enemy" for the U.S.

So Saddams military is destroyed and the U.S. can now control him. Then in 2000, Saddam changes his money from the Dollar to the Euro for his oil transactions. The Dollar is the world standard for which all oil transactions are used. Everyone thought Saddam was nuts because at the time, the Euro was weaker than the Dollar. The following year, the Dollar fell and Saddam was looking like a genius.

The U.S. was afraid that everyone would switch to the Euro and would not need U.S. Dollars for their oil transactions. This would dump billions if not trillions of $$$ and cause massive inflation and destroying the economy.

In 2000, PNAC wrote a paper called "Rebuilding Americas Defenses".

It said that the U.S. needed a "catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor" (Gulf of Tonkin type incident) to kickstart the new wars in the Middle East.

One year later, we got our new Pearl Harbor on Sept 11, 2001.

$3 Trillion and counting......I wonder what the interest is on that loan?

Wars dont get the U.S. out of recessions and depressions, it only puts us further in debt. The more $$ we need for war, the more we borrow from the Federal Reserve Bank.

The banks own more houses now than ever. YOUR property is going into the hands of Bankers. It's called WEALTH CONSOLIDATION.

Someday when Banks own all the private property, I am sure they will let us RENT from them. Or just work for them as a credit for the rent.

10 Conditions For Transition To Communism. How many of these fit the bill right now?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communist_Manifesto#10_Conditions_For_Transition_To_Communism



Wake up, folks! We are almost there.


Why do you think the Mall is so big and the education system sucks?


>

Monday, June 15, 2009

Who is your Daddy?

>

"The Ritual"

Is that the same Rabbi with Obama & McCain? Is he the designated person to make sure they know the proper way to grovel? If you are going to get elected in the United States, you had better learn this ritual. Need proof? Keep scrolling.




Yup Rabbi, you better stand REAL close to McCain, he might snap any minute. He can't find the stage exit, so you might wanna hang really close in case he wanders off.



"Dear Jesus, I want a GI Joe for Christmas". Then later on that day........ "What? They don't believe Jesus was the Messiah? Then what's the big wall for? Isn't this the place where Moses parted the Gulf of Mexico so the Indians could cross and give the Egyptians some food so they could feed baby Jesus"?

Secret Service: "Who let George off the bus? Get him back on the bus pronto and tell him to give that old man his Yarmulke back".



Pucker up Hillary. At least you don't have to wear a funny skull cap. You get flowers and a nasty old Perv kissing and groping you.




Bill, you better lay it on there properly! The 'minder' is standing right behind you! My question is this: If the American leaders have to wear the funny hat, why don't the leaders of Israel wear them? What up with that?








Even the Pope himself must grovel before the wall. This is insane. Get ready world, this is going
to be your new religion.
Below, a small preview of things to come, from a person who would know. You gotta love it when a psychopath goes off-script and starts admitting things he probably shouldn't.

 

 

powrót
 
powrót na górę